Generative mechanisms of causal relations

Generative mechanisms of causal relations

Generative mechanisms of causal relations Having just attended AERA, I came upon a topic that I do have a passion for, so please forgive my briefly re...

54KB Sizes 0 Downloads 4 Views

Recommend Documents

Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms - Columbia University
universe of cases and so cannot assess the value added of peacekeeping.4 .... Durch (fn. 4, 1993), 4. 17 Monitoring miss

Causal Pluralism and Force Dynamics 5.1 Overview Causal relations
2004, Wolff et al. 2010, Sloman, Barbey & Hotaling 2009). If, however, causal relations are understood in terms of count

Generative Grammatik
Noam Chomsky, Begründer der Generativen Grammatik ..... sehen, dass (im Deutschen oder Spanischen) die Determinatorposi

Causal Relations among Stock Prices and Macroeconomic Variables
ABSTRACT. The purpose of this study is to investigate the long run relationship between the Jordanian stock prices and s

Neural Generative Question Answering
Apr 22, 2016 - ... (x1,...,xTQ ) and Y = (y1,...,yTY ) denote the natural language question and answer respectively. The

Causal Idealism
and Kenny Pearce, Oxford University Press). Sara Bernstein. According to causal idealism, causation is a product of huma

Deep Generative Models - University of Cambridge
Nov 17, 2016 - Training “gotchas”: • “the Helvetica scenario” - G collapses too many values of z mapping to th

generative fotografie konkrete fotografie
30.09.2016 - wurde. Die Zeit der Repräsentation, so schreibt Hubertus von Amelunxen, sei in die. Repräsentation der In

Catalinbread | Mechanisms of Music
Catalinbread designs and hand-builds, high quality, industry defining, guitar effects pedals in the U.S.A..

Terminology and generative concepts of the phrase
the subject of an active transitive sentence is the doer of the action, whereas the object is the .... Alfredin the verb

Generative mechanisms of causal relations Having just attended AERA, I came upon a topic that I do have a passion for, so please forgive my briefly relating it to the group. There is currently a great deal of debate in education / policy / and social science research surrounding causation and how best to study it. Nearly all the debate centers on establishing “x causes y”, and it seems to forgo all discussion and analysis of the generative mechanisms explaining that relation (by “mechanism” I mean the generative processes by which a causal relation comes about). That is, the concern is wholly on finding a relation between constructs, not in understanding why or how the relation occurs. As such, the research effort is concerned with identifying and predicting relations without really understanding the phenomena. Identifying and predicting relations is pretty important, so please don’t think I am slighting this kind of analysis. I am just saying that understanding and advancement of science should also encourage study of generative mechanisms that explain such relations. To use a simile, the current research effort on causation is concerned with developing something like a Farmer’s Almanac so we can predict how the seasons change and how to read various signs to predict weather. From experience, certain relations are known – when the moon is hazy, rain is coming. Knowing those relations is important as you at least figure out when you can farm. The problem is that there is a lack of emphasis on meteorology, or understanding for how weather works through air masses, solar radiation, warm fronts, cold fronts, etc. The danger in ignoring generative mechanisms is that (a) there is an ecological fallacy possible in most causal relations and (b) that we never fully understand how identified causal relations work. In their explanations of causal relations, most researchers either infer a mechanism (i.e., instrumental rationality), or they seek a more reductionist research strategy to explain the relation (finding more specific notions of what element of x causes y). I cannot help but think both moves are deficient in some regard. Moreover, I cannot help but think that most explanations draw on a finite set of generative mechanisms (i.e., instrumental rationality, social contagion, social psychological perceptions of imbalance, etc). Therefore, I would like to propose that (1) we further elaborate and define the notion of generative mechanism; (2) that we identify key mechanisms used in explanations of causal relations in education research; and (3) that we offer concrete ideas for how these mechanisms could be directly analyzed. I propose we use Hedstrom and Swedberg’s book on Social Mechanisms as a guide (it’s $21 on Amazon) and go from there.