rauth - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles

rauth - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles

Fax sent by 9497254188 82-18-89 16:25 SYCR Pg: 2/3 COPIES SENT TO ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS STRADLING YOCCACARLSON A PROFESSIONAl ATTORNEYS ALlISON ...

192KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views

Recommend Documents

°1~(~ - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles
Dec 2, 2013 - 17. 607 HUNTLEY DR, WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069-5006. TSU IRENE TRUST. NAGY IVAN. 4337-014-056. LOS ANGELES,

5i#j - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles
May 31, 2016 - Began broadcast career at KPCC in news department headed by Larry ... host many TV shows, including shows

City of Los Angeles - City Clerk Internet Site
Jun 15, 2016 - herebyGRANT(s)to Charles Arthur Ballard and Kathryn Joy Ballard, ... the following real property in the c

DBS - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles
Mar 11, 2016 - Building and Safety (the “Department”) investigated and identified code violations at: 323 East 93rd

adopted - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles
Stein, co-Founder, Sire Records Groups for his Leadership and success in the music ... Seymour Stein born I 942, Brookly

protest - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles
May 14, 2008 - among Century City Inc, S. Jon Kreedman and Century Towers Assn. dated Feb.16, 1973. Copies of these agre

Notice - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles
Dec 29, 2016 - yards of earth from the project site located at 1561 North Blue Jay Way, ... Los Angeles, CA 90012, In ad

parking distr. - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles
Oct 6, 2010 - PPD No. 40. Due to a moratorium, staff from Los Angeles Department of Transportation held an informal meet

budget & finance - City Clerk Internet Site - City of Los Angeles
Aug 4, 2014 - Occupation/profession: Special Assistant, Office of Community Planning ... Community Stabilization Trust f

Fax sent by

9497254188

82-18-89 16:25

SYCR

Pg:

2/3

COPIES SENT TO ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS STRADLING

YOCCACARLSON A PROFESSIONAl ATTORNEYS

ALlISON

A'I' LAW

660 NEWPORT CENTER ORIVEI SUITE 1600

~. BURNS

OIRECT DIAL: (9.49) ....BURN80SYCR.C0I4

& RAUTH

cORPORATION

NEWPORT BEACH. CA g2t56o-e.22

725 ......167

TELEPHONE

(9-1-;) 7254000

FACSIMILE (949) 725-<1100

PROTEST

SAN FAANC!SCO OFFICE .... MONTOOMtlRY aTAftT, SUITt .2(1) SAN FRANCISCO, CAUFOANIA !fHI),4 TELEPHONI! (415) 2$~.%.1"O I'ACSJMILf (415) 2U'U6S

SANTA BAR.BARA OFFICE JO:Z OLIVe STREET SANTA I!lAR9,t.IVI. CALIFORNIA 9~HOt TEI./!PHOl'le (&06} 5e4-o0~5 FAUIM!LE (tI(ll!') 5,4-'044

February 10, 2009

VIA FACSllIULE

City Council of the City of Los Angeles 200 N. Spring Street, Rrn 410 Los Angeles, CA 90012

Re:

February l l, 2009 Council Meeting -Agenda Item No. 27

Dear Councilmembers: This office represents Kramer Metals and Stanley Kramer (collectively, "Kramer"), the owner of the real property (the "Property") that the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles ("eRA") seeks to take by eminent domain in Superior Court Case No. BC318563 (the "Action"). Agenda item no. 27 on YOUf February 11, 2009 agenda seeks your authorization to allocate $405,910 in interest earnings from the eminent domain deposit in the Action to the CD9RP A budgeted line item category "Commercial and Industrial;" however, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section J 268.31 0 et seq., interest on funds deposited in an eminent domain action belong to the property owner. Accordingly, Kramer objects to the proposed allocation of funds belonging to Kramer to support the CRA' s ongoing efforts to forcibly take the Property from its rightful owner, who has operated his business thereon for more than thirty (30) years. Kramer notes that since 2004, the CRA has spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours attempting to forcibly take the Property from its rightful owner, who has operated his business thereon for more than thirty (30) years. What has the CRA achieved by this massive expenditure of time and resources? Nothing. No shopping center has been built and you are now being asked to authorize further expenditures to subsidize this project. Rather than continue to pursue expensive and time consuming eminent domain proceedings, which proceedings have already been dismissed once, we urge the City Council to reject the allocation and instead allow the property owners the opportunity the CRA was legally required to give them long ago - to develop the Property themselves.

i

I

I t

,>. i

Kramer has and continues to challenges the CRA' 5 legal authority to undertake the Project as proposed and forcibly take the Property based on numerous procedural and analytical flaws in the CRA's proceedings regarding the Project that have already once and will again result in the unnecessary expenditure of funds in these futile efforts. Rather than allow Kramer and his neighbor M&A Gabaee ("Gabaee") to proceed with their approved site plans and develop the Property at 110

DOCSOC/132970 I v 1/024646-000 1

r

Fax sent b!,l

9497254188

82-18-89 1&:2&

SYCR

Pg:

3/3

City Council of the City of Los Angeles February 10,2009 Page Two

cost to the taxpayers, the CRA seeks yet another public subsidy to take the Kramer Property to convey it to a private third party for construction of a retail shopping center at a stated cost of $21,395,041 in public tax dollars (the "Project"). illegal and improper because:

The CRA's efforts to take the Kramer Property are



The public interest and necessity do not require the Project proposed by the CRA because any alleged blight On the Property will be eliminated by Kramer/Gabaee' 5 plans to develop precisely the same uses on the Kramer and Gabaee properties, which development has been fully entitled by the City of Los Angeles.



The CRA violated Kramer's owner participation rights under both the eRA's Owner Participation Rules ("OP Rules") and California law by pre-determining to award the Project to Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles ("CCSCLA"); compliance with the OP Rules is a mandatory pre-requisite to the commencement of any eminent domain proceedings.



The CRA failed to provide Kramer with a pre-condemnation offer pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2 prior to the May 5, 2005 hearing on the Amended Resolution of Necessity and the only offer provided to Kramer was legally insufficient to satisfy Section 7267 et seq. at the time of the July 15, 2004 Resolution of Necessity hearing.

I

The eRA pre-determined the outcome of the hearing on the first resolution of necessity for the Kramer Property when, three months earlier, it passed a separate resolution of necessity to acquire the Gabaee Property for the Project, which property could not be developed without the Kramer Property. Kramer urges you to vote against the proposed allocation. Very truly yours, STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH

I,

I I ,

AEB:lat cc:

Stanley Kramer

i

Ir

! I

DOCSOCll32970 1v 11024646·000 I \ i

82-18-89 1£,:25

S'lCR

9497254188

Fax sent hy

Pg:

1/3

STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAw

Ilb~=~=~=_FA=C=S_IM=I=LE=-C~O=VE=R_S=HE=E"..;T~~=~=~=,~ 660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600 Newport Beach, California 92660-6422 Date:

Telephone: (949) 725-4000 Fax: (949) 725-4100

;

,

I

February 10, 2009

i 1

. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS PAGE:

i

3.

I

I

PLEASE DELIVER 1. 2: 3. 4.

5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

RECIPIENT

TITlE

Ed Reyes Wendy Greuel Dennis P. Zine Tom LaBonge Jack Weiss Tony Cardenas Richard Alarcon Bernard Parks Jan Perry Herb J. Wesson, Jr. Bill Rosendahl Greig Smith Eric Garcetti Jose Huizar Janice Hahn Karen E. Kalfayan

Councilmember, Councilmember, Council member, Council member, Council member, Councilmember, Council member, Councilmember, Councilmember. Council member, Councilmember, Council member, Council member, Councilmember, Councilmember, City Clerk

.

As

SOON

District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 9 District 10 District 11 District 12 District 13 District 14 District 15

As

POSSIBLE To: FAX No. 213-485-8907 213-680-7895 213-485-8988 213-624-7810 213-978-2250 213-847-0549 213-847-0707 213-485-7683 213-473-5946 213-485-9829 213473-6926 213-473-6925 213-613-0819 213-847-0680 213-626-5431 213-978-1027

I

j

No. 213-473-7001 213-473-7002 213-473-7003 213485-3337 213-473-7005 213-473-7006 213-847-7777 213-473-7008 213-473-7009 213-473-7010 213-473-7011 213-473-7012 213473-7013 213-473-7014 213-473-7015 213-978-1020 PHONE

.

/ V

v

I I

or

V V

V V V

./ v V

V

i I.

i

!

:

f

I ,!

From:

ALLISON

Re:

Kramer v. Comm. Redevelopment Agency of City of Los Angeles, et al.

Message: Client/Matter No.:

Please see attached. 024646.0001

E. BURNS ArDIRECrDrALNuMBER

(949)

725-4187

if any of these pages is not legible or you do not receive

all of the pages, please call (949) 725-4014.

I CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message is Intended only for the use of the Individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain Information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message Is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communkatlon Is strict1y prohibited. If you have received this communication In error, please notify us immediately by telephone, and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. postal Service. Thank you.

DOCSOClI329733v]/024646-0001

I

r ,

, I

I,.,